Key Words: personality type, temperament sorter, cultural
mosaics, diplomats, U.S. Department of State; U.S.
Foreign Service; U.S. Foreign Service Institute.
National Standard: 10
State Standard: 13
Teaching Level
Lesson Introduction
The characteristics, distribution, and complexity of
Earth's cultural mosaics.
Students will demonstrate an understanding of the impact
of human systems on Earth's surface including the characteristics,
distribution, and migration of human populations; the
nature and complexity of patterns of cultural diffusion;
patterns and networks of economic interdependence;
processes, patterns, and functions of human settlement;
and the forces of cooperation and conflict that shape
human geographic divisions.
If a person is inclined to run his/her own life by a strict schedule, and the people in the nation to which that person is assigned consider schedules unimportant, difficulties can result. Understanding those differences can help the foreign service officer prepare for his/her post.
As students begin a year studying foreign cultures, it is important for them to see that in some instances, cultural norms resemble personality traits. For us to get along, those traits, as well as our own response to them, must be understood.
The following lesson plan, to be used at the beginning
of a cultural geography course, can help to personalize
this complex issue and can assist the student in understanding
cultural mosaics on a global level. It may also be
used in a psychology class with the same objectives
in mind.
Objectives/Purpose
Materials
Procedure
2. Tell students that today they will be describing an imaginary personality.
3. Have students brainstorm a list of personality traits. Settle on a list of traits that would be compatible, since only one person is being described.
4. Ask students to come up with general categories describing their imaginary person. Discuss.
5. Compare their categories with those outlined in David Kiersey's Please Understand Me. [The Kiersey Temperament Sorter is similar to, but simpler than, the Myers-Briggs Personality Test]. Go over the categories to ensure student understanding.
6. Read sample questions from the Kiersey Temperament Sorter. Have students determine what quality the question is designed to analyze.
7. Working in groups of four, with one leader, one recorder, and two question writers, students will come up with a test which they think will reveal personality. At least fifty questions must be included, designed to reveal the personality traits summarized in the four major categories.
8. Allow time for this exercise. Then meet as a whole group to compile a common list of questions for the test. The questions should be listed in categories, in order that a scoring sheet similar to Kiersey's may be designed. Questions should then be placed at random through the testing instrument.
9. On the second day, students should take the test and analyze the results.
10. In order that the students' privacy be respected, they should each write their four-letter personality type on a scrap of paper and hand it in to the teacher. The teacher should then list and tabulate the different personality types on the board.
11. Note the number of different personality types in this classroom alone. Discuss the fact that world-wide, there are not only different personality types, but also many different cultural norms. The possibilities for personal and cultural diversity are amazing.
12. Tell students that throughout the course, they might try to analyze the culture of each study center with their own personalities in mind.
As foreign service officers, what understanding would
they need to have of the other culture and of themselves
in order to be effective negotiators and to win recognition
for official U.S. government policies overseas?
Evaluation/Assessment
Extension/Enrichment
Additional Standards
Reflection
Thank you,
The authors.
Original file name: 331rtf - converted on Tuesday, 20 October 1998, 20:56
This page was created using TextToHTML. TextToHTML is a free software for Macintosh and is (c) 1995,1996 by Kris Coppieters