|
 |
== Policy on Scientific Misconduct
In recent years, a few well-publicized cases of misconduct in research, including fabrication of results, plagiarism, and misrepresentation of findings, have aroused concern among institutions of higher education, individual investigators, sponsors of research, professional societies, and the general public. Although verified instances of such dishonest behavior are relatively rare, they do indicate the need to be diligent in protecting the integrity of academic work and the stewardship of public and private funds. Allegations of dishonesty by members of the college and university community must be dealt with carefully and thoroughly and with appropriately defined procedures if a college or university is to merit continued public confidence and trust.
In the event of allegations of scientific misconduct, Keene State College identifies the Procedures for Grievance and Arbitration (Article VI) outlined in the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the USNH Board of Trustees, Keene State College, and the Keene State College Education Association (July 1, 1999 - June 30, 2002) as that which will be followed by the Institution and which will be available to any faculty member named in an allegation of misconduct in science.
In the National Science Foundation notice, "Responsibilities of Institutions and Investigators in the Conduct of Science," dated October 7, 1996, the NSF indicates that the "primary responsibility for investigation, enforcement, and reporting when fraud or misconduct is alleged rests with the grantee institution." In the event that the results of the proceedings indicate it is appropriate, Keene State College will report to the funding agency and will notify any professional organization or publication which has disseminated research or service results which are determined to be tainted as a result of serious scientific misconduct.
|
|
Federal Funds